CAP-STRAT Project 4: Scenario writing and application of the system
The whole third year of the project is devoted to the application of the validated modelling system for policy analysis. However, the scenario writing (WP13) already starts in month 18 with a one-day meeting between the co-ordinator and DG-AGRI in order to check DG-AGRI's main fields of interest in order to define a crude scenario outline. The early start is necessary to potentially adjust sub-modules of the modelling system to the requirements of specific scenarios. Accordingly, the envisaged timing not only allows to implement such changes (WP5-WP8), but also ensures that these changes are validated (WP9-WP11). The exact definition of the scenarios will then start with month 28 when first results of the reference run are available.
The execution of the reference run (WP12) is a demanding task aiming to forecast the development of the agricultural sector over the next decade under current policy settings. The work package will be carefully prepared based on a one week training session in month 24, in travel-cost-saving connection to workshop 02. This session will introduce all teams to the application of the validated modelling system using the developed software tools and to the methodology of the reference run. The latter requires to define assumptions on exogenous shifts regarding technical progress, farm structure, population, macro-economic development, demand patterns to develop a plausible model run. After first results are achieved, they will be presented at a meeting between the project team and DG-AGRI in the middle of the work package's spread (workshop 03, month 27). The common analysis of the reference run will be the basis for its finalisation and also serves to specify in detail the scenario definitions for the simulation runs (WP14). Afterwards, the scenario definition must be mapped in the numerical language of the model system in months 28-30.
Experiences from past projects show that a meeting over several days, carefully prepared by the different teams, is necessary in order to finalise the reference run, because the multitude of different exogenous assumptions must eventually be modified to come up with an overall consistent specification and plausible result. This so-called "melting down" meeting will take place in month 30 and is devoted to the completion of the reference run and the preparation of simulation runs.
The scenario simulations (WP14) span the last half year of the project. During the last weeks, the results will be analysed and prepared for a concise presentation at the final meeting (month 36) to DG-AGRI and for the final report.
WP12: Reference Run
|WP13: Scenario Writing|
|WP14: Simulation Runs|
- Agricultural non-CO2 emission reduction potential in the context of the 1.5 °C target Frank, S., Havlik, P., Stehfest, E., van Meijl, H., Witzke, H.-P., Pèrez Dominguez, I., van Dijk, M., Doelman, J. C., Fellmann, T., Koopman, J. F. L., Tabeau, A., Valin, H. (2019): Nature Climate Change 9: 66-72.Effect of mineral fertilizer on rain water and radiation use efficiencies for maize yield and stover biomass productivity in Ethiopia Srivastava, A. K., Mboh, C. M., Gaiser, T., Kuhn, A., Engida, E., Ewert, F. (2019): Agricultural Systems 168: 88-100.Assessing Sustainable Food and Nutrition Security of the EU Food System—An Integrated Approach Zurek, M., Hebinck, A., Leip, A., Vervoort, J., Kuiper, M., Garrone, M., Havlik, P., Heckelei, T., Hornborg, S., Ingram, J. S., Kuijsten, A., Shutes, L., Geleijnse, J. M., Terluin, I., van´t Veer, P., Wijnands, J., Zimmermann, A., Achterbosch, T. (2018): Sustainability 10(11)(4271): pp. 1-16.Explaining farm structural change in the European agriculture: a novel analytical framework Neuenfeldt, S., Gocht, A., Heckelei, T., Ciaian, P. (2018): European Review of Agricultural Economics jby037: pp. 1-56.Brexit: an economy-wide impact assessment on trade, immigration, and foreign direct investment Jafari, Y., Britz, W. (2018): Empirica: 1-36.Heterogeneous impacts of neighbouring farm size on the decision to exit: evidence from Brittany Saint-Cyr, L. D. F., Storm, H., Heckelei, T., Piet, L. (2018): European Review of Agricultural Economics jby029: pp. 1-30.Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy Hasegawa, T., Fujimori, S., Havlik, P., Valin, H., Bodirsky, B. L., Doelman, J. C., Fellmann, T., Kyle, P., Koopman, J. F. L., Lotze-Campen, H., Mason-D Croz, D., Ochi, Y., Pèrez Dominguez, I., Stehfest, E., Sulser, T. B., Tabeau, A., Takahashi, K., Takakura, J. y., van Meijl, H., van Zeist, W.-J., Wiebe, K., Witzke, H.-P. (2018):
Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy, Nature Climate Change 8: 699-703.Does the current trade liberalization agenda contribute to greenhouse gas emission mitigation in agriculture? Himics, M., Fellmann, T., Barreiro-Hurle, J., Witzke, H.-P., Perez Dominguez, I., Jansson, T., Weiss, F.(2018):
"Does the current trade liberalization agenda contribute to greenhouse gas emission mitigation in agriculture?", Food Policy article in pressMajor challenges of integrating agriculture into climate change mitigation policy frameworks Fellmann, T., Witzke, H.-P., Weiss, F., van Doorslaer, B., Dusan, D., Huck, I., Salputra, G., Jansson, T., Leip, A. (2018):
"Major challenges of integrating agriculture into climate change mitigation policy frameworks", Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 23(3), pp 451-468Metrics, models and foresight for European sustainable food and nutrition security: The vision of the SUSFANS project Rutten, M., Achterbosch, T., de Boer, I., Crespo Cuaresma, J., Geleijnse, M., Havlik, P., Heckelei, T., Ingram, J. S., Leip, A., Marette, S., van Meijl, H., Soler, L. -G., Swinnen, J. F., van't Veer, P., Vervoort, J., Zimmermann, A., Zimmermann, K. and Zurek, M. (2018):
"Metrics, models and foresight for European sustainable food and nutrition security: The vision of the SUSFANS project", Agricultural Systems 163, pp.45-57